HaugenMetaphilosophy
HaugenMetaphilosophy
  • 335
  • 731 802
Reading Philosophy
This video provides advice for Reading Philosophy. Students should identify the Question the philosopher is trying to answer, what the philosopher believes Answers the Question, the Terms the philosopher uses, the Assertions or evidence, which Inferences, any Objections and Rebuttals.
Переглядів: 169

Відео

Milling About
Переглядів 153Рік тому
John Stuart Mill. For your pleasure. Right click and select "Loop" for hours and hours of pacing fun. Alternately, I am relearning how to use my animation software.
Kinds of Evidence: Which is Appropriate?
Переглядів 121Рік тому
This series of videos discusses Inductive Arguments. This video explains that these various kinds of probability are not equivalent and that different topics require different kinds of evidence. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Kinds of Evidence: Plausibility
Переглядів 129Рік тому
This series of videos discusses Inductive Arguments. This video continues with the kinds of evidence by explaining Plausibility. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Kinds of Evidence: Propensity
Переглядів 37Рік тому
This series of videos discusses Inductive Arguments. This video continues with the kinds of evidence by explaining Propensity Probability. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Kinds of Evidence: Frequency
Переглядів 140Рік тому
This series of videos discusses Inductive Arguments. This video continues with the kinds of evidence by explaining Frequency Probability. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Kinds of Evidence: Logical Possibility
Переглядів 145Рік тому
This series of videos discusses Inductive Arguments. This video begins looking at the kinds of evidence starting with Logical Possibility. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Supporting, Defeating, and the Balance of Evidence
Переглядів 65Рік тому
This series of videos discusses Inductive Arguments. This video looks at the strength of the conclusion as supported by the balance of evidence. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Available Evidence vs. Absent Evidence
Переглядів 44Рік тому
This series of videos discusses Inductive Arguments. This video explains the difference between Available Evidence and Absent Evidence. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Introducing Inductive Arguments
Переглядів 73Рік тому
This set of videos introduces Inductive Arguments. The series starts with distinguishing inductive arguments from deductive arguments. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Arguments and Other Paragraphs
Переглядів 156Рік тому
This video introduces the distinction between arguments and other kinds of paragraphs. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-... Artist: incompetech.com/
Atomic Propositions and Complex Propositions
Переглядів 3972 роки тому
This video explains atomic and complex propositions. Easy Lemon 30 Second by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1200078 Artist: incompetech.com/
How to Read A Book Chapter 9: Determining An Author’s Message
Переглядів 6543 роки тому
This Chapter covers the sixth through eighth rules of Analytical Reading.
Every Belief . . .
Переглядів 2633 роки тому
When people ask me for what philosophy is good.
How To Read and Submit Reading Quizzes
Переглядів 3,3 тис.3 роки тому
How To Read and Submit Reading Quizzes
How To Read A Book Chapter 8: Coming to Terms With An Author
Переглядів 8043 роки тому
How To Read A Book Chapter 8: Coming to Terms With An Author
Quick Phil Up 1: the Converse of a Universal Affirmative
Переглядів 4183 роки тому
Quick Phil Up 1: the Converse of a Universal Affirmative
The Consequences of either Accepting or Rejecting King’s Conclusion
Переглядів 5073 роки тому
The Consequences of either Accepting or Rejecting King’s Conclusion
Do You Accept or Reject King’s Conclusion?
Переглядів 3973 роки тому
Do You Accept or Reject King’s Conclusion?
King’s Goal and the Theory Used to for His Decision on Non-Violence
Переглядів 5563 роки тому
King’s Goal and the Theory Used to for His Decision on Non-Violence
What is King’s Goal? What Theory is He Using To Decide On Direct Non-Violent Action?
Переглядів 4653 роки тому
What is King’s Goal? What Theory is He Using To Decide On Direct Non-Violent Action?
Three Steps Before Action
Переглядів 6793 роки тому
Three Steps Before Action
What Steps Should You Take Before Action?
Переглядів 1,3 тис.3 роки тому
What Steps Should You Take Before Action?
Do You Disagree With Aristotle?
Переглядів 9503 роки тому
Do You Disagree With Aristotle?
How To Produce Happiness According to Aristotle
Переглядів 1,1 тис.3 роки тому
How To Produce Happiness According to Aristotle
What is Happiness According to Aristotle?
Переглядів 8 тис.3 роки тому
What is Happiness According to Aristotle?
Instrumental and Independent Goods
Переглядів 1,1 тис.3 роки тому
Instrumental and Independent Goods
What is Aristotle’s Answer?
Переглядів 9383 роки тому
What is Aristotle’s Answer?
What Question is Aristotle Trying to Answer?
Переглядів 1,2 тис.3 роки тому
What Question is Aristotle Trying to Answer?
Disagreeing With Epicurus
Переглядів 5973 роки тому
Disagreeing With Epicurus

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @METAFilsafat
    @METAFilsafat 12 годин тому

    MODULAR REASONING There are many ways to contemplate. Through the power of sense, one can explore through experiences or imagine. Let's try to contemplate through imagination. We will learn how to reason modularly (modular reasoning). We will grasp this concept by involving strong imagination. 〰〰〰 🧩 Imagine you have 5 pieces of Lego. You attach paper to ... 〰 Lego 1 is labeled "tomato", 〰 The second Lego = "orange", 〰 The third Lego is labeled "sugar", 〰 The fourth Lego is labeled "water", 〰 The fifth Lego is labeled "glass". 👉 Then you give these Legos to a young child who doesn't know what a glass is, doesn't know what sugar is, and has never seen an orange. 👉 Or to make it easier to understand, let's assume the child can't read the labels. Time to take action ❗️ The young child tries to connect the 5 Legos together. What happens❓ It turns out that the 5 Legos can be combined into 2 different structures ... 1⃣ Lego 1 + Lego 2 〰 Fruit Legos 2⃣ Lego 3 + Lego 4 + Lego 5 〰 Ready-to-drink Legos Impressive, isn't it? The child is able to connect the Legos AND FORM KNOWLEDGE. Why is it possible like this❓ Yes, because the labels on the Legos have been placed in a specific shape according to their labels so that they can be connected to each other (cause and effect) based on the meaning of the writing attached to the Lego. To form a specific meaning. Similarly, this happens in the universe. Everything is formed from (physically speaking) quanta (building blocks), or even smaller units. They have particle spins (directions). Or a mathematical/physical formula has components that form one formula. Example: v = d/t, then the Legos are "v", "d", and "t". Each module (Lego) already has its own specific shape (rule). Our task depends on the context. 1⃣ Testing knowledge❓ 👉 This means knowledge is broken down into small Lego pieces (modules) 〰 Then observe the shape of the Lego, what does it have written on it (what rule does it have)? 〰 When there is similarity while searching for the shape of the Lego that is considered its connection, then other modules that fit together need to be searched. 🧩 If all the shapes of the pieces from a mathematical/physical formula are successfully known and they fit together, then we come to know that the knowledge indeed yields the intended result, because seen from the module pieces, they can be connected (cause and effect), which concludes the result from what we knew before being broken down. 2⃣ Understanding knowledge❓ 👉 This means knowledge is broken down into small Lego pieces (modules) 〰 Then each piece's nature is examined, and we get an overall picture of where it's headed. 3⃣ Searching for a piece of knowledge❓ 👉 Here, we're feeling for a certain form of piece (module - Lego) of reality - empirical. 〰 We conduct experiments to understand its properties and see in which direction a module block's property from a finding can be connected with another piece. 〰〰〰 Dimension of Reason Actually, the forms of module block Lego knowledge are already in the dimension of reason (in the form of instincts or something more abstract). These forms of knowledge blocks are stored in the knowledge warehouse in the dimension of reason (central server). And they've been connected to the computer client, which is us. When we try to observe empirically, what's actually happening is that we're trying to feel to find a certain form (nature) without making a mistake (inconsistency). IF, AND ONLY IF THE CHANNEL FROM THE CENTRAL SERVER (dimension of reason) is well-connected, not interrupted, then our perception (CCTV) can estimate (adjust) how far the form of what we're observing (empirically) is. This happens because behind us, a program of artificial intelligence is connected, helping observe through our vision (CCTV). 👉 Because of this (our connection to the dimension of reason), we can deduce (through careful observation) to see its absolute truth (the bigger picture). 〰 We reuse the information from these knowledge blocks to solve problems from points 1 to 3.

  • @alexrolfe3620
    @alexrolfe3620 16 годин тому

    As long as philosophy and individual thought exist, facts and opinion will always be disputable. The fact the earth is round, still to this day stumps people who have the opinion it is flat, and they themselves believe that is a fact. I think a more interesting question is if you think of the Human race as a collection of individuals derived from (many a years ago) a single cell organism. Are we just arguing with ourselves? We all derive from the same thing. Physics states energy is neither created nor destroyed (granted opinionized consideration of this statement may deem it invalid, as it too is just an opinion that has developed into fact by repeat experiment) and so everything contained in this system we call a universe all derives from the same core fundamental thing. Do we just argue with ourselves to learn collectively? Like an AI trys and fails something to learn what not to do next time?

  • @hansenng1028
    @hansenng1028 14 днів тому

    So glad to have found this

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 14 днів тому

      I am glad you enjoyed the video. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @cemtemiz7870
    @cemtemiz7870 23 дні тому

    I recently became interested in philosophy and decided to make an introduction to the philosophy with this book. English is not my first language so it's a slow reading for me :). Luckily, I just discovered your channel and the way you explain is like very vivid understanding of the book after i read the chapter. Thank you so much your videos are amazing.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 23 дні тому

      I'm glad you enjoyed the videos and found them useful. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @user-kg1od9es5d
    @user-kg1od9es5d 26 днів тому

    This is amazing!!!

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 23 дні тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

    • @user-kg1od9es5d
      @user-kg1od9es5d 23 дні тому

      @@haugenmetaphilosophy welcome dude. you have opened my mind up. pls keep posting!!!

    • @user-kg1od9es5d
      @user-kg1od9es5d 23 дні тому

      @@haugenmetaphilosophy The vibe of your videos are just amazing. Nature and philosophy fit so perfectly!

  • @TiffanyTurner-iu9hh
    @TiffanyTurner-iu9hh Місяць тому

    Your Awesome!

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy Місяць тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @julesjgreig
    @julesjgreig Місяць тому

    Good job sir, thank you

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy Місяць тому

      I appreciate the compliment, and you are welcome. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @EjorneMC
    @EjorneMC Місяць тому

    Awesome video and well explained. I've stumbled upon a few of your videos in the past when trying to understand topics I am reading at the moment and they have been super helpful! I love the way you record outside and the way you simplify and explain complex chapters. I noticed that you haven't uploaded in a year or so now and its a shame because you're a brilliant help with all things philosophy. Keep up the good work and wishing you the best !

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy Місяць тому

      I appreciate the compliment. I have not published in a while, but I have some plans in that regard. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @Kingfish179
    @Kingfish179 Місяць тому

    You have a gift for making complex topics accessible. Also, I like your editing style! It reminds me of Discovery Channel documentaries back when they were genuinely educational.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy Місяць тому

      Those are two very large compliments-thank you. I have to laugh about the Disney channel documentaries being from "that generation" myself. I can't claim I intentionally mimicked the style-other than the videos I have created for this channel, I have no experience. I am glad you enjoyed the video. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @CameshaCamz
    @CameshaCamz 2 місяці тому

    Love this, really easy to understand. I side with Aristotle for within the little me(child) came a big me (adult) not from nothing, we are something.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 2 місяці тому

      I am glad you liked the video. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

    • @CameshaCamz
      @CameshaCamz 2 місяці тому

      I most certainly will, I got alot from this video, watched it a couple of times to get everything, have to say I heard a word in it. We all have a purpose given to us by the unmoved mover God for me Jesus Chirst, it is upon all of us to leave this world in full actuality- giving all He placed in us to be deposited in the world (dominion) fulfilling purpose, in doing that we have fulfilled the goal of leaving no potentiality, leaving this world empty, not with things we were supposed to do but didn't get done. Hence why it is said that the cemetery is the richest place on earth- where the record of many are that died with books that were never written, impact that was never put forth. As sons and daughters of the unmoved mover, we must thrive to become all that He has destined for us, for in so doing we become like him, having no potentiality remaining but ending in actuality. God bless you for being obedient in taking the time out to do this video. Though done 9 years ago, it is and will always be current👍​@@haugenmetaphilosophy

    • @CameshaCamz
      @CameshaCamz 2 місяці тому

      I most certainly will, I got alot from this video, watched it a couple of times to get everything, have to say I heard a word in it. We all have a purpose given to us by the unmoved mover God for me Jesus Chirst, it is upon all of us to leave this world in full actuality- giving all He placed in us to be deposited in the world (dominion) fulfilling purpose, in doing that we have fulfilled the goal of leaving no potentiality, leaving this world empty, not with things we were supposed to do but didn't get done. Hence why it is said that the cemetery is the richest place on earth- where the record of many are that died with books that were never written, impact that was never put forth. As sons and daughters of the unmoved mover, we must thrive to become all that He has destined for us, for in so doing we become like him, having no potentiality remaining but ending in actuality. God bless you for being obedient in taking the time out to do this video. Though done 9 years ago, it is and will always be current👍

  • @enna8286
    @enna8286 2 місяці тому

    Hope you're doing well professor. I'm back here on the class material and 2306 material after the fact practicing necessary precautions with my amateur work in artificial intelligence. Locke's "tacit consent" is an interesting issue right now for me, and I'm reviewing material. Cheers!

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 2 місяці тому

      I'm glad you are enjoying the videos . . . again. Locke discussed consent more than a little. I don't not discuss it much here, however. Still, I'm glad you enjoyed the videos.

  • @yacobcastro
    @yacobcastro 3 місяці тому

    Doesn’t Aristotle keeping the universal of forms go against his ideas of metaphysics?

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 3 місяці тому

      Well, he explicitly uses Form in his conception of substance and the four causes. He does reject Plato's conception, but he does still have his own conception of Form.

    • @yacobcastro
      @yacobcastro 3 місяці тому

      @@haugenmetaphilosophy interesting

  • @johnsontrimble7881
    @johnsontrimble7881 3 місяці тому

    That ending really hit. Thank you so much for this adventure! ❤

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 3 місяці тому

      I am glad you enjoyed the videos. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @samanthamendoza6637
    @samanthamendoza6637 3 місяці тому

    The Production 🤌🤌 I appreciate all the effort and work put into your videos Professor Haugen! Just had to let you know!

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 3 місяці тому

      Thank you. I appreciate the compliment. I am glad the videos work for you.

  • @SiddheshDhumal-nv9si
    @SiddheshDhumal-nv9si 3 місяці тому

    I had this chapter for the discussion exam in our college. Going through that text is kinda hard (I don't understand much English). Your Video helped me alot. Thanks!!🫶🏻

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 3 місяці тому

      I am glad it was useful for you. Thank you for watching and spread the word.

  • @onikn9138
    @onikn9138 3 місяці тому

    Thank you again. Really wonderful information.

  • @onikn9138
    @onikn9138 3 місяці тому

    I will find out but what is the difference between Platonic forms and Berkeley's ideas of no matter?

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 3 місяці тому

      I cannot really give a full answer now, but I can give a short answer and provide a link to one of my videos explaining Plato's theory of Forms. The short answer distinguishing the difference between what Plato calls appearances and what Berkeley calls ideas. Appearances are known through sensation whereas Form is known through Reason; appearances are subjective knowledge whereas Form is objective; appearances of the particular whereas Form is the universal; and appearances are temporary whereas Form is eternal. ua-cam.com/video/Evl8-LXwZtQ/v-deo.htmlsi=v1NZgSc-AIkUELHt&t=925

    • @onikn9138
      @onikn9138 3 місяці тому

      @@haugenmetaphilosophy Thank you!

  • @LittleMew133
    @LittleMew133 3 місяці тому

    What I have glimpsed so far is that I absolutely should not read this book while sleepy or drunk.

  • @LittleMew133
    @LittleMew133 4 місяці тому

    I went into this playlist thinking someone will read the book to me. I did not know there would be a reenactment xD

  • @moncifsalaheddinehabbas9912
    @moncifsalaheddinehabbas9912 4 місяці тому

    Your videos are great they helped me a lot thank you so much

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 4 місяці тому

      I am glad they were useful. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @scrubtech87
    @scrubtech87 4 місяці тому

    I just wanted to say thank you for making a straight forward and easy to follow video. I was trying to understand Glaucon's point of view, and this was very easy to understand.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 4 місяці тому

      I am glad they are helpful. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @LikeARollingStone248
    @LikeARollingStone248 4 місяці тому

    Thank you! I need help understanding philosophy college courses. Thanks to your channel, I now only have to search your videos, which, thank goodness, cover most of the Philosophy college course material. And I can listen to how you explain the teachings in a matter-of-fact, simplistic manner while comprehending the information given. With your help, I can understand the philosopher's theories while utilizing them in my studies and daily comprehensive communication.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 4 місяці тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

    • @LikeARollingStone248
      @LikeARollingStone248 4 місяці тому

      @@haugenmetaphilosophy Already done (check). You're awesome & have a fantastic gift of articulating information in a unique, almost universal assent style or manner :-) Never change how you are as a person with your abilities that directly affect the exceptional quality of your teaching. And please continue to explain these problematic theoretical debates. For some of us who have an "opposite type of major," they're a little too deep if you know what I mean. However, it is constructive & beneficial as long as someone like you can explain it!

  • @LikeARollingStone248
    @LikeARollingStone248 4 місяці тому

    You're a LIFESAVER! I was so confused in my philosophy college course, but you explained everything perfectly and simplistically. Now, I'm no longer confused, and I have you to thank for it! I'm officially a subscribing member :) Must see more videos!! o_0

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 4 місяці тому

      I am glad the videos are useful, and I appreciate the compliment. Out of curiosity, at which college or university are you studying? Thanks for watching and spread the word.

    • @LikeARollingStone248
      @LikeARollingStone248 4 місяці тому

      @@haugenmetaphilosophy National University, San Diego California. But prior to here, I went to school in good ole Texas. You are most welcome, btw, & I will most definitely spread the word. Please continue the amazing work, and never....ever change.

  • @julesjgreig
    @julesjgreig 4 місяці тому

    Very good summary, thank you.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 4 місяці тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @williambrister9524
    @williambrister9524 4 місяці тому

    Thanks, very well and very clearly explained in the perfect setting to discuss Aristotle. Nature striving for perfection, actuality.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 4 місяці тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @Learning-ej3mr
    @Learning-ej3mr 5 місяців тому

    Being resonable actually makes life easier... You can be reasonable by questioning your own existing thoughts and come to a reasonable conclusion.. Damn it's very useful

  • @schiaudano
    @schiaudano 5 місяців тому

    Philosophy without the gobbledygook, thanks.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 5 місяців тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @kredit787
    @kredit787 5 місяців тому

    Learned a lot from philosophy, although came to the conclusion its sufficient to study critical thinking, reasoning and logic without necessity to read any philosopher

  • @valentineanastassiou3411
    @valentineanastassiou3411 5 місяців тому

    Thank you Sir for such an excellent analysis of the Categories, as presented by Aristotle. With your presentation you manage to make a difficult subject fun, enjoyable and understandable.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 5 місяців тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @RoyTheReplicant
    @RoyTheReplicant 5 місяців тому

    Thanks for this video.

  • @joebazooks
    @joebazooks 6 місяців тому

    subsistence? i would say persistence. in fact, the provision of persistence to "identities/concepts/whatever" is a(/the?) major purpose of language in the first place. imagine if the rate at which language changed matched the rate at which reality changes. language would suddenly become impractical for meager minds and thus lose any utility it once possessed. i have no idea how ppl believe in realism, invoking unnecessary, arbitrary, and frankly baseless complexity into their interpretation of reality

  • @joememphis1571
    @joememphis1571 6 місяців тому

    Didn’t you sexually harass one of my classmates a while back? She told me you’re a creepy person. Hope you don’t talk to your wife like that.

  • @lyssafranks9723
    @lyssafranks9723 6 місяців тому

    background music is loud

  • @ritimasahikiya
    @ritimasahikiya 6 місяців тому

    dude looks like Dwight Shrute, and I love it

  • @nisa-lm6pf
    @nisa-lm6pf 7 місяців тому

    helped for my midterm🙏🏻 thanks

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 7 місяців тому

      I"m glad to hear that. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @alexvasilev7976
    @alexvasilev7976 7 місяців тому

    Very well spoken and easy to grasp on, well done!

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 7 місяців тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @oguntekinOG
    @oguntekinOG 7 місяців тому

    yunan dinleri için bu doğru olabilir jüpiter insan gibi hem de tanrı gibi bir gün insanlara acıyor öbür gün karısı junoyu aldatıyor ama semitik orijinli tanrılarda tanrı mutlak iyi olması lazım

  • @samuelsackey2582
    @samuelsackey2582 7 місяців тому

    You have gain a subscriber 🎉❤ I am watching from Ghana

  • @alexanderjanespecter4203
    @alexanderjanespecter4203 7 місяців тому

    amazing

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 7 місяців тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @kishenniranjan7336
    @kishenniranjan7336 8 місяців тому

    Great video Prof.!

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 8 місяців тому

      I appreciate the compliment. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @TheGeneralNut
    @TheGeneralNut 8 місяців тому

    That tree must of loved it when he talked about its purpose

  • @augustodelerme7233
    @augustodelerme7233 8 місяців тому

    434 love joy & hope 👉 youtube

  • @francisbackmask3472
    @francisbackmask3472 8 місяців тому

    So playing Competitive online PvP is higher pleasure?

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 8 місяців тому

      That is a good question. My first thought is "no". Something like, CoD, does not use the sort of strategy that a game like chess incorporates. I am not saying there is no strategy in CoD-merely that the strategy in chess is much more complex. They are both combat or war games, but chess demands more of the player. I will not pretend that I am the final word on the matter. Like I said, it is a good question.

    • @francisbackmask3472
      @francisbackmask3472 8 місяців тому

      @@haugenmetaphilosophy I think the higher pleasure becomes lower once you invest money in it.. So buying stuff for your character cease making it a. Higher pleasure since Chess don't require such pay to play things..

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 8 місяців тому

      Maybe. But you have to demonstrate that CoD is a higher pleasure before investing-I'm not sure Mill would agree. @@francisbackmask3472

  • @hassan07e
    @hassan07e 8 місяців тому

    Thanks for these series I am a beginner in the Philosophy thing and am self teaching myself I think this book is kind of amazing to start with quite easy to understand the language of Russel and your explanatory videos strengthens the viewpoint

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 8 місяців тому

      I am glad this has been helpful. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

    • @fckinfruit
      @fckinfruit 16 днів тому

      so how far have you come now?

    • @hassan07e
      @hassan07e 10 днів тому

      @@fckinfruit not much been busy a lot

  • @thevaliantjosh
    @thevaliantjosh 9 місяців тому

    It's funny, In Morrowind (An Elderscrolls Game) I like to turn invisible and steal things. If I were to have the Ring of Glaucon, maybe I would get some "highly discounted groceries" these prices our absolutely outrageous these days. Now, to be 100% transparent (see what I did there) if I were to get away with it absolutely, and nobody were to come looking for this item, (Not likely though because this is a high ticket item) I would want a RAM TRX, and an Xbox Series X, and and a Samsung TV, and a new couch.... oh no! I've turn into Gloulem!...are those sirens?

  • @thevaliantjosh
    @thevaliantjosh 9 місяців тому

    This is very interesting to consider. In relationships it is true that we must consider the other persons interests, even over our own. Otherwise, arguments happen and chaos ensues. It goes the the opposite way as well, if we feel our own needs our not being met, we start to have spite towards our partner; there is a balance that must kept equal. In the case of being sick, you would consider your own health above anything else. A Nurse (for the most part) would consider your health and recovery above their own needs, assuming that is their passion.

  • @tizflint1155
    @tizflint1155 9 місяців тому

    I like to believe that even after the video ends our professor continues to walk around the woods aimlessly. Forever thinking and pondering about philosophy discussed in these videos.

  • @hunterluxton5976
    @hunterluxton5976 9 місяців тому

    Not a great way of explaining Russell. A bit boring and uninteresting. Try a dufferent approach more graphics you personally don't need to be in the video.

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 9 місяців тому

      You are welcome to create your own videos if you think you can do better.

  • @avirachantomy9242
    @avirachantomy9242 9 місяців тому

    thank you

    • @haugenmetaphilosophy
      @haugenmetaphilosophy 9 місяців тому

      You are welcome. Thanks for watching and spread the word.

  • @beatrizadame9438
    @beatrizadame9438 9 місяців тому

    Found you.